FOR ALL YOU DOUBTERS AND CREATIONISTS READING THIS:
THIS IS MY BLOG, NOT YOURS, AND I YES, I KNOW I’M NOT A SCIENTIST AND THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH MY GRAMMAR AND PUNCTUATION -- BUT BEING A GRAMMAR NAZI DO NOT COUNT AS A LOGICAL ARGUMENT AGAINST ME NOR THE SCIENCE FEATURE ON THIS PAGE, BUT YOUR TROLLING DOES TICKLE ME.
LOVE
GALE.
www.youtube.com/user/galerouth ---You might learn something more about abortion and the bible, and atheism.
WATCH THIS VIDEO BEFORE PROCEEDING:
OH, YEAH BABY, IT'S SCIENCE TIME:
“When individuals of the same species parasitize individuals of the same species, they are referred to as intraspecific parasites.”
http://krohde.wordpress.com/article/parasitism-an-introduction-to-xk923bc3gp4-51/
HUMAN FETUS IS NOT A BABY (GOOGLE THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CHART), but a parasite because of the biological relationship that’s based on the behavior of one organism (fetus) and how it relates to the woman's body:
As a zygote, it invaded the woman's uterus using its TROPHOBLAST cells, hijacked her immune system by using NEUROKININ B, HCG and INDOLEAMINE 2, 3-DIOXYGENASE --- so her body doesn't kill it, continue stealing her nutrients to survive, and causing her harm or potential death.
This shows how the zygote invades the woman’s uterus, (remember MAMMALIAN pregnancy is not A GODDAMN MIRACLE, it happens every day to many species on this planet-- so keep your fucking mythical god out of this abortion debate, please).
“The placenta functions as an immunological barrier between the mother and the fetus, creating an immunologically privileged site. For this purpose, it uses several mechanisms: It secretes NEUROKININ B containing phosphocholine molecules. This is the same mechanism used by parasitic nematodes to avoid detection by the immune system of their host.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_tolerance_in_pregnancy
"Due to its highly-negative charge, HCG may repel the immune cells of the mother, protecting the fetus during the first trimester. It has also been hypothesized that HCG may be a placental link for the development of local maternal immunotolerance."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_chorionic_gonadotropin
slmccoy
April 5, 2012 at 6:00 pm, |http:www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/
"The woman’s immune system can attack the embryo and placenta via attack T-cells, blood complement, and antibodies. The embryo signals the placenta to produce INDOLEAMINE 2, 3-DIOXYGENASE, which catabolizes the tryptophan in the woman’s body. Starved of this necessary amino acid, the attack T-cells have to go into latency to survive, though the woman’s blood complement and antibodies can continue to attack."
IT’S COMMON KNOWLEGDE THAT NUTMEG AND BLACK COHOSH ARE A WELL-KNOWN ABORTIFACIENTS BECAUSE OF THEIR HIGH L-TRYPTOPHAN LEVELS -- SO THE ABOVE CLAIM MAKES SENSE TO ME.
HERE ARE SOME MORE SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES PROVING HOW THE FETUS INVADES AND SUPPRESSES A WOMAN'S IMMUNE SYSTEM, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER PARASITE.
EARLY PREGNANCY FACTOR
EPF is an immunosuppressant. Along with other substances associated with early embryos, EPF believed to play a role in preventing the immune system of the pregnant female from attacking the embryo.[11][16] Injecting anti-EPF antibodies into mice after mating significantly[quantify] reduced the number of successful pregnancies and number of pups;[17] no effect on growth was seen when mice embryos were cultured in media containing anti-EPF antibodies.[18] While some actions of EPF are the same in all mammals (namely rosette inhibition), other immunosuppressant mechanism vary between species.[19]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_pregnancy_factor
THE SEARCH
FORLINKS BETWEEN IMMUNOGENETIC FACTORS AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE.
“Decidual
macrophages produce IL-10 and tryptophan catabolizing enzyme indoleamine 2,
3-dioxygenase (IDO) (Heikkinen et al. 2003). IDO is one of those
molecules that may suppress maternal T-cell activation. Inhibition of IDO in
mice, especially in allogeneic mating combinations, results in fetal rejection
with lethalinflammatory response, with T-cell infiltration and activation of
complement. The role of IDO as a protective molecule at the materno-fetal
interface seems to be especially important when there are sufficiently
mismatched MHC antigens between mother and fetus (Melloret al. 2001).”
http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514277449/isbn9514277449.pdf
– PAGE 17EXTINGUSHING MATERNAL IMMUNE RESPONSES DURING PREGNANCY: IMPLICATIONS FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESION.
Mammals owe their existence to immunosuppressive processes that prevent fetal rejection in utero. Blocking tryptophan catabolism during murine pregnancy allows maternal T cells to provoke fetal allograft rejection. Cells expressing indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which catabolizes tryptophan, prevent T cell cycle progression and enhance activation induced T cell death.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11437628
MECHANISMS
OF MATERNAL IMMUNE TOLERANCE DURING PREGNANCY.
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an enzyme that
catabolizes the essential amino acid Ltryptophan that is required for the
biosynthesis of proteins….As tryptophan is an indispensible requirement for
cell growth, it was proposed that IDO may have other important roles. Indeed,
there are intriguing associations between altered
tryptophan metabolism and cell-mediated immune
responses. For example, enhanced tryptophan catabolism by macrophages has been
shown to inhibit T cell proliferation and it appears that the expression of IDO
by cells allows them to suppress unwanted T cellresponses (Munn et al., 1999).
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/31280/InTech-Mechanisms_of_maternal_immune_tolerance_during_pregnancy.pdf
-- page 10
PREGNANCY: WHY MOTHER’S IMMUNE SYSTEM DOES
NOT REJECT DEVELOPING FETUS AS FOREIGN TISSUE.
“The researchers discovered that embryo implantation sets off a process that
ultimately turns off a key pathway required for the immune system to attack
foreign bodies. As a result, immune cells are never recruited to the site of
implantation and therefore cannot harm the developing fetus.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120607142244.htm
IMPLANTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
PLACENTA: INTRODUCTION AND INDEX.
“Throughout gestation, the mammalian embryo is a parasite that survives
"at the pleasure" of its mother. Early in gestation, the embryo is
small and has correspondingly small requirements for nutrients and for waste
disposal systems - it subsists by taking up endometrial secretions and dumping
its metabolic wastes into the lumen of the uterus. This situation changes
rapidly.”http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/reprod/placenta/index.html
PREVENTION OF ALLOGENEIC FETAL REJECTION BY TRYPTOPHAN CATABOLISM.
“The differentiation
and growth factor MCSF (macrophage colony-stimulating factor) was used to
generate macrophages that suppress in vitro T cell proliferation by
catabolizing tryptophan (5). MCSF is also an important growth factor in
trophoblast (17). We speculate that MCSF may influence the
differentiation of cells capable of expressing IDO and of suppressing T cell
proliferation introphoblast and other normal tissues.”
PLACENTA-DERIVED
EXOSOMESAND THEIR ROLE IN THE IMMUNE PROTECTION OF THE FETUS.
This could be one of
the explanations why, although the maternal immunesystem during pregnancy is
downregulated, it is not completely blunted. Pregnant womenare more sensitive
to infections during pregnancy; however, they are still able to mount amodified
immune response. The temporarily “semi- immunocompromized” maternal defence
during pregnancy is the price humans have to pay for the elaborate hemochorial
mode of reproduction, required to provide the huge amount of oxygen and
nourishment necessary forthe fetal development of the highly complicated and
sophisticated human brain.
CONTINUING ON:
"It is also possible for a symbiotic relationship to exist between two organisms of the same species."
http://www.answers.com/topic/symbiosis -- Gale's Science of Everyday Things
Just like a parasitic twin, see below --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitic_twin
This fucking HUMAN whose attached to another HUMAN’s head, is a PARASITE; humans can be parasites to other humans, so fuck your pro-life propaganda SITE: Libertarians for Life - Why the Embryo or Fetus Is Not a Parasite saying, “a parasite can’t be the same species as the host,” just look at the picture, damn it— your science is clearly wrong.
THERE’S ANOTHER ONE, TOO BAD – YOUR ALL-LOVING
JESUS COULD HAD PREVENTED THEIR SUFFERING, BUT CHOSE NOT TO.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/parasite
PREGNANCY CAUSES HARM: http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
ANOTHER HINT THAT A FETUS IS A PARASITE: MENSTRUATION
"Menstruation is a consequence of self-defense. Females build up that thickened uterine lining to protect and insulate themselves from the greedy embryo and its selfish placenta. In species with especially invasive embryos, it’s too late to wait for the moment of implantation — instead, they build up the wall pre-emptively, before and in case of fertilization. Then, if fertilization doesn’t occur, the universal process of responding to declining progesterone levels by sloughing off the lining occurs."
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/12/21/why-do-women-menstruate/
So what I listed was more than enough evidence to prove the human fetus is a parasite, that you pro-life-schizophrenic-fascists are wrong and your website: Libertarians for Life - Why the Embryo or Fetus Is Not a Parasite is nothing more than just a propaganda site filled with intellectual dishonesty as ruse to trick women into not having abortions.
Just some extra scientific truth for ya:
THE FETUS DOESN'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO FEEL PAIN --WHEN MOST ABORTIONS OCCUR, SO DON’T BE AFRAID TO ABORT IT:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/the-human-condition/2010/06/25/does-the-fetus-feel-pain-uk-report-says-no.html
Babies Feel Pain at 35 to 37 Weeks of Development, Experts Say – AND PLEASE WATCH WHAT YOU FEED YOUR FETUS, TOO.
Another Study Suggests ‘Fetal Pain’ Laws Are Totally Bogus.
Here are some sites about prenatal development, so you can stop calling a fucking parasitic fetus, an “unborn baby”:
http://www.ehd.org/dev_article_unit1.php
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002398.htm
http://main.uab.edu/show.asp?durki=19952
Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from
cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocysts.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136065/
-- EMBRYOS ARE NOT FUCKING BABIES!
THIS IS
THE LAW:
ABORTION IS A CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
SUPPORTED BY THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY, THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE 14TH
AMENDMENT, AND THE 13TH AMENDMENT.
NO HUMAN (that means the FETUS, too) has a right
to life or any due process rights by the 14th amendment to use another human's
body or body parts AGAINST their will, civil and constitutional rights: that's
why you are not forced to donate your kidney---the human fetus is no exception;
this is supported by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment AND 13th
amendment, which makes reproductive slavery unconstitutional.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause
"Section 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary
servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been
duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to
their jurisdiction.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
This makes viability unconstitutional because
pregnancy is not a crime.
Consensual sex=/= a legal, binding contract to
an unwanted fetus to live; and abortion is not murder, the unlawful killing
with intent.
THE BIBLE:
the bible supported abortion, that was done by a priest, in god's name, in his holly temple!
the 1984 NIV footnote of numbers 5:11-31 explained what "to thy thigh to rot, they belly to swell" meant: numbers 5:21 "or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness" to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.
http://www.evilbible.com
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/abortion.html
The judeo-christian god is a myth and historical evidence proves it: